While policies vary widely between organizations, job descriptions are not strictly confidential. Some companies may restrict who can access a job description (JD), but generally, employees have access to their own JD, as do their supervisors.
There are some instances where policies may differ, specifically in cases where there is concern over sensitive or proprietary information, as could be the case in industries related to national security, advanced technology, or research and development. If any of these scenarios apply, a job description management system that supports role-based access is needed to prevent unauthorized access.
So, while the answer is broadly, “No, job descriptions are not confidential,” they are not necessarily widely available, and this article will dive into a few examples.
Job descriptions are shared internally and externally for various reasons. Employees have access to their own job descriptions and can refer to them anytime. Managers, direct supervisors, and executive leadership also have access to job descriptions, although some managers may be restricted to those of their direct reports only.
Employees are not often privy to their colleague’s JDs and don’t need to be. However, there is no explicit legal reason for this unless the job entails some of the areas mentioned above, namely national security, proprietary or intellectual technology, R&D, etc. Keeping job description information siloed in these cases may be necessary to protect trade secrets or ensure sensitive information isn’t shared outside the organization.
Some aspects of job descriptions may be confidential, such as compensation. Salary benefits and bonus information are not typically shared for many reasons. Employers may not want their competitors to know the pay scales for their most competitive positions. They also don’t want employees discussing salaries with their colleagues or having pay scales become a point of contention, as it could create friction, resentment, or feelings of inadequacy when it’s not explicitly warranted.
An employer may want to protect the confidentiality of its compensation beyond a mere policy. It’s not unheard of for companies to have employees sign confidentiality agreements to protect this information, either in the form of an NDA, employment agreement, or employee contract with a statement to that effect. Without such explicit direction, it’s up to the ethical judgment of HR to protect such information in alignment with company standards.
Many think that job descriptions and job postings are one and the same. However, there are significant differences between the two that have a bearing on the topic of confidentiality.
Job descriptions are internal documents that may potentially contain confidential information. Job descriptions can sometimes include information that should be private or only known between the employee and HR, such as compensation. Job postings may contain salary and bonus ranges but do not necessarily represent the final offer.
Medical information must also be kept private, including any accommodations for individuals with disabilities. Such information is not protected under HIPAA unless the data comes directly from a healthcare provider or insurer. Still, like compensation information, it could be damaging to the individual or result in personal bias if it were leaked or shared.
Job postings are externally-facing documents used to attract new candidates. Postings may contain generalized information about a job that would otherwise be confidential if it were an actual job description. You could say that the job posting is a hypothetical situation, whereas the job description is an agreement with an actual person; therefore, some details must be kept private to protect the integrity of the job and the individual.
When job descriptions include confidential information, it’s critical to protect it from unauthorized access. Though job descriptions aren’t necessarily confidential or legally protected, there may be details within the job description the employer does not want to share. And rightly so; sensitive information, compensation, bonuses, benefits, accommodations for medical limitations, language, religion, etc., should remain between the employee, HR, and their direct superiors.
If details like the above were to be leaked and cause harm to the employee, it could be grounds for legal action.
But how do you keep specific details private while making the job description available to people who need access to it?
When job descriptions are created and managed on local computers, stored in paper files, or shared drives, it would be impossible to shield some information and not others.
A job description management system like JDXpert is the solution, providing you with the flexibility needed to manage confidentiality.
Job descriptions created and managed in JDXpert can be configured with user-based access, ensuring only people with the correct permissions can view or edit the file.
JDXpert also allows you to create different versions of job descriptions, which could focus on specific data relevant to various teams or individuals. For example, one version could be for HR, another for the employee, one for recruiting, and a separate JD for managers.
Versioning is also helpful if the job changes in any way. The updated version will take priority, but older versions will still be available should any stakeholder want to compare or understand how the job has evolved over time.
JDXpert makes it easy to hide sensitive information from defined users or restrict editing capabilities for specific sections of the job description. Advanced features like these enable a high degree of confidentiality, even when only certain details need to be hidden. With paper files or shared drives, such a task would be impossible.
We’ve discussed confidentiality in job descriptions and why some information might need to be protected or access limited. Transparency is another matter altogether.
Employees need to be able to access their job descriptions. Managers may need to review JDs occasionally as well. Job descriptions may also be made available for viewing when a vacancy is imminent or in cases where it pertains to career pathing. When employees can visualize where their job may lead, it creates a sense of purpose and may be a mitigating factor in their decision to stay with the company.
Candidates also need to view job descriptions to ensure they are a good fit for jobs before they start the onboarding process. Restricted access to the job description at this stage could lead to hiring mistakes or onboarding failure.
Lack of transparency in job descriptions can be a source of frustration at the very least and could even hasten the decision to leave a job for greener pastures.
Creating a job description catalog or portal where employees can view their JDs anytime supports and enables transparency, builds trust between employees and the organization, and makes it easier for managers to do their jobs. Roles are clearly understood, resulting in fewer misunderstandings.
In answering the question of whether job descriptions are confidential, we’ve explored scenarios in which some information should be kept private and highlighted reasons why there is a need for transparency and access to JDs for various personnel. While the landscape is complex—especially when there are compliance issues to consider—JDXpert makes it possible to maintain confidentiality while enabling transparency for all stakeholders.